Andreas Lindh / @addelindh nailed it.
https://twitter.com/addelindh/status/561972115604537344
Andreas Lindh / @addelindh nailed it.
https://twitter.com/addelindh/status/561972115604537344
Disruptive Innovation, as a concept, is overused in business literature to an unbearable level, and almost permanently misused by startups and self proclaimed thought leaders, describing their own new app or promoting their own blog.
And no, Uber is not disruptive, either. No app monetizing on people sharing things is. Internet to allow this, is.
Des Sicherheitsnetzwerkes München.
Agenda der Veranstaltung, die von Peter Möhring, Leiter der Geschäftsstelle, und Dr Kathrin Jaenicke, geleitet wurde, beinhaltete im wesentlichen den Rückblick auf das vergangene Jahr wie auch die Perspektive auf das kommende Jahr.
(more…)
Next to the available versions of Ubuntu for the Desktop, Server and the Cloud, Mark Shuttleworth announces a new version of Ubuntu for the Internet of Things. Snappy Ubunutu Core aims to provide a common firmware for “Smart, connected things” on ARM and x86, that introduces a new standard for update-ability and security.
via Mark Shuttleworth » Blog Archive » Smart things powered by snappy Ubuntu Core on ARM and x86.
@amcafee: Technology is not our destiny. We shape our destiny.
🆕"Technology is not our destiny.
We shape our destiny."#dld15 @amcafee pic.twitter.com/bs4vCqivnk— Antonio Vieira Santos (@AkwyZ) January 18, 2015
via Twitter.
In Safari Books.
https://twitter.com/fmavituna/status/555769470321688576
Organizations have to become more mature in their processes while they grow. While this is true for all types of organizations, my perspective is an IT and IT related one alone, also being part of other organizations. With complex technologies coming into every aspect of business, individual solutions are being provided by increasingly specialized vendors. With this, the number of service providers, managing products and – more importantly – solutions, the number of involved parties rises, which in turn increases complexity.
Now that setup of multiple parties involved requires organization to make it work properly. Processes need to be introduced, to track progress, make sure the right parties get the right information at the right time, and progress and outcome are trackable and manageable.
All of the requirements are clear to justify a strict process. Provided they are viewed from the right angle. Participants in the process, staff executing individual steps, have difficulties seeing the purpose.
A transparent process is easier to follow for individual contributors. Management needs to feed back outcome of work, results to their staff. When everybody understand what he is doing, less steps will be done wrong. Eventually it will even take out complexity out of some processes, because transparency can help avoid the need for exceptions to be built in.
Please share your thoughts!
Raum W201, LMU Lehrturm, Professor-Huber-Platz 2, 80539 München