Own goal as World Cup Wi-Fi passwords spilled in newspaper snap.
A very important question, not asked often enough. In particular not at conferences around security. Even more when sponsored by companies trying to sell their security product.
At the Secure Munich Conference, somebody asked this question. In a discussion that followed a Sales Engineer presenting their security product, trying to make a sound differentiation between internal and external attackers, as well as trying to explain the difference between malicious and careless.
While the question itself was asked quickly, the following discussion seemed to be a bit disappointing. “Why do companies not procure secure products?” was immediately interpreted in a way a security vendor would phrase it. Yes, of course, companies purchase security products, but not enough. Oh, what if the security product itself was insecure? Well, can’t comment on our competition.
With that, at a security conference, the question feels like it is being marginalized, in particular in the security space. The security industry rotates to much around itself.
Bruce Schneier writes about Falsifying Evidence on a Smart Phone. He links to an article from Scientific American, that describes the idea to make phone lie.
Team Black Sheep fliegt dann mal so über das höchste Gebäude der Welt. Das sind 829m.
Fnord of the day: Symantec says Antivirus is dead.
Daniel Fett und Guido Schmitz von der Uni Trier werden Ihre Forschungsergebnisse bezüglich der Sicherheit des Identity Service “Mozilla Persona” bei dem “IEEE Sympossium on Security and Privacy” präsentieren.