Tag: USA

  • The iPhone with tariffs

    WSJ analysis of iPhone with and without tariffs

    We often take the intricate global dance behind our favorite gadgets for granted. But shifts in international trade policy can have very direct consequences for the devices in our pockets. A recent Wall Street Journal piece dives into a topic that could hit close to home for many tech consumers: the potential impact of renewed US tariffs on Chinese goods, specifically focusing on Apple’s iconic iPhone.

    Summary of the Situation

    The core issue explored in the WSJ article (linked below) revolves around the possibility of significant tariffs being imposed on goods imported from China, potentially under a future administration revisiting policies from the Trump era. Given the iPhone’s deep manufacturing roots in China, it stands as a prime example of a product that could be directly affected.

    Key takeaways from the reporting include:

    1. Significant Price Increase: Analysts estimate that substantial tariffs (potentially mirroring past proposals) could force Apple to raise iPhone prices considerably, with some projections suggesting an increase of over $100 per device to offset the new costs.
    2. Apple’s Diversification Efforts: Apple has been actively working to diversify its manufacturing footprint, notably increasing production in countries like India and Vietnam. While significant, this shift hasn’t fully decoupled its reliance on China’s highly developed electronics supply chain.
    3. Complex Supply Chain: Moving intricate manufacturing processes like those for the iPhone is a slow, complex, and expensive endeavor. Even with diversification, a large portion of assembly and component sourcing remains tied to China, making it difficult to completely sidestep tariff impacts in the short-to-medium term.
    4. Consumer Impact & Strategy: Such a price hike could significantly impact consumer demand. Apple would face a tough decision: absorb the tariff costs (hitting their margins), pass them partially or fully to consumers (risking lower sales), or find some complex combination thereof.

    Essentially, the article paints a picture where geopolitical trade decisions could directly translate into higher costs for one of the world’s most popular consumer products, despite Apple’s ongoing efforts to build resilience in its supply chain.

    A Critical Perspective

    While the WSJ article clearly outlines the potential direct cost implications, it’s worth considering a few broader points:

    • The Precision of Estimates: Predicting the exact price increase is inherently difficult. The final impact depends on the specific tariff percentage, potential exemptions, Apple’s strategic pricing decisions, currency fluctuations, and the overall state of the global economy at the time. The $100+ figure is a stark estimate, but the reality could be more fluid.
    • Beyond Price – The Ripple Effects: The focus is often on the consumer price tag, but tariffs create wider ripples. They can strain international relations, potentially invite retaliatory tariffs impacting other sectors, and create long-term uncertainty for companies making global investment decisions. Is the intended goal of the tariff (e.g., boosting domestic production, addressing trade imbalances) effectively achieved, or do the disruptions outweigh the benefits?
    • The Diversification Reality: While Apple’s move towards India and Vietnam is strategically sound for long-term risk mitigation, the article implicitly highlights the sheer scale and sophistication of China’s manufacturing ecosystem. Building parallel capabilities elsewhere takes immense time and investment. Tariffs might accelerate this shift, but they could also disrupt the existing, highly efficient (if geographically concentrated) system before alternatives are fully mature, potentially leading to unforeseen bottlenecks or quality control challenges.
    • Who Ultimately Pays?: While the narrative is often “company vs. tariff,” history suggests that tariffs imposed on imports are frequently passed through, in large part, to consumers or downstream businesses. The debate then becomes less about punishing a country or company and more about the impact on domestic consumers and inflation.

    The prospect of more expensive iPhones due to trade policy serves as a tangible reminder of how interconnected global economics, politics, and the technology we use every day truly are. It underscores the delicate balance companies navigate and the potential costs consumers might bear when that balance is disrupted.

    Source:
    The Wall Street Journal – iPhone Prices Could Jump Over $100 Under Tariffs on China
    https://www.wsj.com/tech/personal-tech/iphone-apple-tariffs-china-bb20c7a3?st=xaZQfQ 

  • Twelve Million Phones, One Dataset, Zero Privacy

    Twelve Million Phones, One Dataset, Zero Privacy

    is part one of One nation, tracked, an New York Times investigation series of smart phone information tracking and by Stuart A. Thompson and Charlie Warzel, within their privacy project. The research covers multiple topics, only starting out with an analysis of the potential contained in smartphone tracking information.

    What we learned from the spy in your pocket.

    Twelve Million Phones, One Dataset, Zero Privacy

    The authors analyse a large dataset of location information from New York and Washington, DC, cell phone users. With the analysis, the article debunks myths about data privacy. The key takeaway of the analysis, to my interpretation are:

    Twelve Million Phones - One Mobile Phone User in Munich
    Mobile Phone User – Munich
    1. Data is not anonymous – the authors successfully identified a Senior Defense Department official and his wife. And this was possible during the Women’s March. According to authors, nearly half a million descended on the capital for this event. (Other sources only mention one hundred thousand attendants)
    2. Data is not safe – the authors point out complex relationships of companies in the tracking business. Complexity makes it impossible to ensure ownership. There is no foolproof way for anyone or anywhere in the chain to prevent data from falling into the hands of a foreign security service.
    3. Affected persons cannot consent – the authors criticism seems reasonable. Virtually all companies involved with tracking require user consent. And even cell phones make the geo-tracking feature visible to users. Only barely anyone in the business makes purpose transparent. In other words, no company prominently announce how they package and sell data or insight.

    One Nation, Tracked

    The article is a creepy read, but worth the time spending. The series One Nation, Tracked continues with 6 other parts:

    1. discussing how to Protect Yourself
    2. National Security, which is for the the US in the article.
    3. details on How it works
    4. individual spying in One Neighborhood
    5. Protests is about how this business betrays democracy
    6. And offers Solutions through privacy rights.

    Source: Opinion | Twelve Million Phones, One Dataset, Zero Privacy – The New York Times

  • MBA KW 6/2011

    In der Welt Online ist diese Woche über den MBA Studenten Sebastian Kempf zu lesen, der sein Studium bei INSEAD in Frankreich und USA absolviert: http://www.welt.de/print/die_welt/finanzen/article12453456/Erst-mal-Business-Luft-schnuppern.html

    Ebenso in der Welt Online zu finden, aber deutlich nachdenklicher gibt sich folgender Artikel, in dem vor einer Inflation des Titels gewarnt wird: http://www.welt.de/wirtschaft/karriere/leadership/article12373501/Experten-warnen-vor-Inflation-des-MBA-Titels.html Nach Ansicht des Autors ist in Deutschland bereits mit Einführung regulärer Masterprogramme, als Ersatz für das Diplom, der Höhepunkt für MBA Programme überschritten und genügend Verwirrung/Verwischung um deren Bedeutung gestiftet worden.

    Dafür kann man in eben derselben Publikation lesen, dass es auch Prominente MBA Aspiranten gibt: Oliver Kahn strebt den Titel MBA an der Universität in Salzburg an! http://www.welt.de/print/welt_kompakt/print_wirtschaft/article12393029/Macht-sinnvoll-einsetzen.html

    Die Wirtschaftswoche berichtet in Ihrer Online-Ausgabe “Wie deutsche Top-Manager vom MBA profitierten”. In dem Artikel berichten Qiagen CEO Peer Schatz, Douglas-CEO Henning Kreke und der Xing Vorstandschef Stefan Groß-Selbeck von Ihren Erfahrungen mit MBA Programmen. http://www.wiwo.de/management-erfolg/wie-deutsche-top-manager-vom-mba-profitierten-455225/

    DerStandard.at hat einen Artikel, der als Wegweiser gedacht ist, für wen ein MBA das richtige ist. http://derstandard.at/1295571097938/Karrieretreiber-Wie-wann-und-warum-gerade-einen-MBA

    Ein Rückblick auf das Zusammentreffen der MBA Studenten aller Programme an der WHU – Otto Beisheim School of Management findet sich auf der Homepage des Instituts: http://www.whu.edu/cms/whu/aktuelles/aktuelles/article/geballte-mba-power-an-der-whu/?cHash=d4e05dde6c9d115a25ef4650bd63261c

    In München sucht die TUM einen Studentischen Mitarbeiter für Ihr MBA Programm: http://www.ikom.tum.de/jobs/show/33852

    Bei e-fellows.net findet sich gleich eine ganze Serie über MBA. Diese Woche ist dort über den “Finalen Feinschliff” zu lesen: http://www.e-fellows.net/show/detail.php/23341 Die Serie lässt sich offenbar nur über die Navigation anspringen, ein Inhaltsverzeichnis was nicht zu finden.

    Die Open University Business School (OUBS) ist im Februar in Frankfurt, Stuttgart und München. Darüber informiert jetzt auch http://uni-protokolle.de/nachrichten/id/210866/

    Etwas allgemeiner wird voraussichtlich die Internationale MBA-Messe in Wien ausfallen. Die Veranstaltung findet am 10. März im Grand Hotel Wien statt: http://www.studium.at/36582-internationale-mba-messe-10-maerz-2011-wien. Die Veranstaltung erfordert eine Anmeldung, die man unter http://www.topmba.com/mba-tour tätigen kann. Dort findet man auch die Information, dass die MBA Tour am 14. bzw. 17. März auch nach Deutschland, nämlich nach Frankfurt und Düsseldorf, kommt.

    Dass es auch kleinere und weniger bekannte Hochschulen mit MBA Programmen gibt, kann man der Nachricht über die Hochschule Deggendorf entnehmen. Dort wird berichtet, dass Ihr MBA Programm bereits seinen 10 Durchgang beginnt: http://www.wochenblatt.de/nachrichten/deggendorf/regionales/10-Durchgang-MBA-General-Management-steht-vor-der-Tuer;art1147,32320

    Bereits Anfang der Woche hat mba-exchange.com bekanntgegeben, dass ebendiese Recruiting-Website mit dem Schwedischen Unternehmen Universum zusammenarbeiten wird: http://blog.mba-exchange.com/2011/02/mba-exchangecom-and-universum-join.html. Universum hilft Unternehmen beim Personalmarketing und dem Aufbau einer Marke als Arbeitgeber.