Tag: opinion

  • Meta Meetings

    We know Facebook has big plans for the Metaverse. The company even rebranded as Meta to underline it’s ambition. On Labstalk, we almost spent the entire season discussing benefits and goals of the technology, alongside with all the other tech topics in the same space, like Web3, NFTs and DOAs.

    Introducing Horizon Workrooms: Remote Collaboration Reimagined, https://about.fb.com

    Back to Meta (the company) and the Metaverse: among others, one of the foundational use-cases the company re-imagines – to make it attractive to the promising B2B market: virtual or remote meetings.

    And if you ever get to see any of the promotional images: At first glance, these that really look like a meeting in a 3D Room can be a viable alternative. In the pandemic the corporate workforce first came from plenty of travel and got force-used to Zoom and Teams meetings, only to develop even worse meeting fatigue because in-person required travel. Now after almost three years of pandemic, the audience is eager for something new and the time seems right for a different format.

    Alone: the hype doesn’t materialise.

    Parmy Olson from Bloomberg reports that Accenture, among other companies that are reference customers to Facebook/Meta’s Occulus platform, bought plenty of gear, 60k devices, some as long as 2 years ago. To use these devices for new hire orientation. AstraZeneca, another major customer, wouldn’t even comment.

    The virtual conference room needs to die. VR is better used for fun and building relationships.

    Source: Meta’s VR Headset Quest Won’t Replace Zoom – Bloomberg

    A major reason for the lack of momentum I can confirm from own experiences is the bad reputation Facebook/Meta has for their perspectives on privacy and handling of sensitive data. The ‘surveillance capitalism’ approach the company takes with this new technology and economy bet becomes apparent in the pricing strategy for these Occulus devices. The Facebook/Meta (or ‘surveillance’)-free version of the device, that appears technically identical, is about 30% more expensive, according to sources in well informed circles.

    Personally, I believe in the concept but can re-affirm these concerns and understand the restraints that come alongside the curiosity. While the investments that Meta makes in the technology help the hardware make necessary progress towards user-acceptance, other players need to step in and provide applications to help solve corporate acceptance.

  • Former Munich Mayor Explains How Microsoft Hates Linux

    Christian Ude, Oberbürgermeister von München zwischen 1993 und 2014.

    Christian Ude speaks in a new interview about what Microsoft did in Munich and elsewhere in Europe in order to undermine GNU/Linux and impose Microsoft Windows on everybody, together with all the spyware Microsoft provides for it (likely violation of privacy laws)

    Techrights.org

    Source: Former Mayor of Munich Explains How Microsoft Hates Linux | Techrights

  • Do away with the Product Owner Role

    Mike Cohn of Mountain Goat Software has an opinion on Scrum’s Product Owner Role. It’s controversial, and Product people will disagree.

  • Das Dilemma mit der Digitalisierung

    Nun ist es  ja so, daß Digitalisierung seit Monaten, wenn nicht Jahren in aller Industrie-Munde ist. Man muss sich verändern, um den Konzernen aus USA, im speziellen dem Silicon Valley, mit Ihren neuartigen Geschäftsmodellen Schritt zu halten. Die Cloud ist der vermeintliche Treiber für diese veränderte Geschäftskultur, die eine nicht einzuholende Geschwindigkeit ermöglicht. (more…)

  • Haskell and the Future of Coding

    Haskell is a 25-year-old programming language that isn’t all that popular. But Facebook uses it, and that’s a sign of things to come.

    Wow. Not for a single day in the past 18 years did I even remotely think Haskell had a future. Even more with fancy hipster languages like, Ruby (not so much anymore), Scala, Groove, Erlang or even Clojure showing up, in commercial environments. Facebook is proving me wrong.

    via: Facebook’s New Spam-Killer Hints at the Future of Coding | WIRED

  • Economics Has a Math Problem

    The field begins to look like others that rely on data.

    This is a discussion I had more than a decade back with economy students, as a student of computer science. The argument was much the same and nothing much has changed in the meantime. The difference is more data is available today and can be used much easier, though, which is to Noah Smiths argument.

    via: Economics Has a Math Problem – Bloomberg View

  • Software sucks. Says @zeynep

    Why the Great Glitch of July 8th Should Scare You.”  When United had to ground its fleet, the NYSE and WSJ were down. Because of software.

  • The magical security unicorn.

    The purpose of security software is to make other software more secure. This is what the security industry claims, sometime with legit arguments, sometime the industry tries to chase unrealistic ideals, as a recently linked article suggest.

    And I couldn’t agree more. The security industry approaches the problem from the wrong end, most of the time. With keeping in mind the principles of security, Integrity, Availability and Authenticity, security software helps mitigate threats in the class of Vulnerabilities, Exploits and malicious software and payloads. Products available to purchase can be considered in classes of, Encryption (Integrity and Authenticity), for data in rest (disk encryption, file encryption) or for data in transit (VPN or protocol encryption). Backup is clearly saving Availability, but most companies in the security industry consider this a different topic. Then there are products to limit access, e.g. Network Layer Firewalls, which have a very distinct functionality. Up to here, things are very clear and deterministic. When it comes to Application Layer Firewalling, e.g. Web Application Firewalls things start to get fuzzy.

    Products that aim to protect from any unknown threat, malware or payload, like Anti Virus, Anti Spam, Intrustion Prevention and even Vulnerability Scanners, provide information that is know already.

    Now that a particular exploit is know, protection for it can be provided in two distinct locations: the vulnerable software can be patched to remove the problem. Or, what the security industry offers, have another piece of software in place that tries to protect from something that is known already. And with that, raising system complexity and opening another vector for vulnerability.

    The sustainable approach is to invest in secure software and architecture, that has built in encryption, authentication and redundancy. This is something the security industry can provide as technology vendors, rather than chasing the magical unicorn.

  • Keep LinkedIn professional.

    Andreas Lindh / @addelindh nailed it.

    https://twitter.com/addelindh/status/561972115604537344